Under Islamic Law an individual born to a Muslim father is born a Muslim and if he rejects Islam he is to be regarded as an infidel. While Islam tolerates Christians who have never been Muslims, it rejects Christians who were born to Muslims as the worst kind of infidel, one who actually rejected Islam. See the following example:
Now there is no question that Obama was born to a Muslim father and that he went to Muslim Madras schools as a child. But he meets with Islamic leaders regularly who would be required to shun him as an Islam-rejector... which implies that they do not believe he is an Islam rejector... which would imply that Obama is accepted by them as a Muslim....
Just thinking out loud...
However he is the head of the (still) most powerful country in the world, which would be a reason for them to tolerate status quo.
On the other hand, consider follwoing:
By Muslim standards, he is a Muslim. He identifies himself as a Christian.
I think Islamic leaders do not shun him because they are using him to their own advantage.
Obama clearly defends and is friendly to Islam.
"On October 14, 2011 United States President Barack Obama ordered the deployment of 100 U.S. troops to help regional forces combat the Lord's Resistance Army, saying "I believe that deploying these U.S. Armed Forces furthers U.S. national security interests and foreign policy..."
So Obama is sending US tropps to help the Ugandan Islamic regional armies to wipe out the Christian anti-fascist anti-sharia movement.
Yes but by the same standard he should attack most Islamic countries in the world.
And who told the US to police the world anyway ?
Of course he is a muslim(a.k.a. devil-worshipper).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCAffMSWSzY&feature=related All the evidence I need to convict him right here.