Nazarene Space

WASHINGTON - When Barack Obama was looking for an entree into Chicago’s elite business community, he had the perfect door-opener: Penny S. Pritzker, a billionaire from one of the city’s dynasties.


Ms. Pritzker, 49, went on to become the Obama presidential campaign’s national finance chairwoman, raising record-breaking sums. And after Mr. Obama won the election, she was widely reported to be a leading contender for commerce secretary.

But the same business holdings and connections that made Ms. Pritzker so vital to Mr. Obama’s ability to raise campaign money also came under sharp scrutiny. On Thursday, she released a statement declaring that she would not be a candidate for the job.

“I think I can best serve our nation in my current capacity: building businesses, creating jobs and working to strengthen our economy,” Ms. Pritzker said. “It has been my great privilege to serve in the Obama campaign. I look forward to helping our new president in every way possible and am excited about the future under his leadership.”

Ms. Pritzker is one of three cousins who manage their family’s fortune, which includes Hyatt hotels, casinos and other ventures. She oversees a chain of luxury retirement communities, an airport parking company, a realty group and the credit-rating agency TransUnion.

The talk of a cabinet post, which would require Senate confirmation, had cast a spotlight on her secretive family’s empire and her past business dealings, including episodes that might prove politically embarrassing.

Earlier in her career, Ms. Pritzker was involved in running and overseeing Superior Bank, in a Chicago suburb, which focused on bundling subprime mortgages into securities, the practice that later helped set off the current financial crisis. The institution collapsed in 2001.

Moreover, Ms. Pritzker’s family is renowned for finding ways to avoid paying taxes on its wealth. The Pritzkers were pioneers in using tax loopholes to shelter their holdings from the Internal Revenue Service, and many of their dealings have never been made public.

It was not clear why she put out the statement on Thursday, but some news outlets, including The New York Times, reported late Wednesday night that she was in the final stages of being vetted. An Obama transition spokesman said Thursday that those accounts were incorrect.

Burt Ely, a banking consultant who testified at a 2001 Senate committee hearing about the failure of Superior Bank, said it had never made sense for Ms. Pritzker to become a nominee. “The confirmation hearing could have been quite ugly for all that would have been dredged up about Superior as well as possibly other Pritzker dealings,” Mr. Ely said Thursday.

In 1988, the Pritzker family and another wealthy investor took over a failing savings and loan and turned it into Superior Bank. Ms. Pritzker was its chairwoman from 1991 to 1994, after which she sat on the board of the bank’s holding company.

In 1993, the bank began a strategy of concentrating on packaging subprime mortgages into securities. At first, the bank flourished. But regulators later discovered accounting irregularities that overstated the value of its assets. The bank was forced to write down huge losses, leaving it without adequate capital in the spring of 2001.

In May 2001, Ms. Pritzker wrote a letter to bank employees assuring them that her family would put more cash in to save the bank, and declaring that “our commitment to subprime lending has never been stronger.” But the Pritzker family did not carry out the plan, and the bank was shut down in July 2001

A 2002 report by the inspector general of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation concluded that “the failure of Superior Bank was directly attributable to bank management and the board of directors ignoring sound risk management principles and failing to adequately oversee Superior operations.”

The Pritzkers agreed in 2001 to pay the F.D.I.C. $460 million over 15 years to cover claims by depositors. Still, more than 1,400 depositors who had more than $100,000 in their savings accounts — the maximum the government then insured — were left short about $10 million, said Clint Krislov, a lawyer for several of them. “Why the Pritzkers wouldn’t do the right thing and just make these people whole for the small amount of money that it would take, I still cannot understand,” he said.

In a written response to questions by The Times on Thursday, Ms. Pritzker said, “I sincerely regret the closing of Superior Bank.” She said that she did not personally own any of the bank, but that her trusts had contributed to the “large amount of money” that her family paid to the F.D.I.C.

The Pritzker clan’s fortune traces back to a Chicago law firm run by Ms. Pritzker’s grandfather, who bought up property during the Depression and became an investor. His sons expanded the empire, establishing the Hyatt chain.

The family also increased its wealth by exploiting loopholes in the tax code, including setting up a series of offshore trusts that sheltered their assets from taxes.

The I.R.S. fought several battles with the Pritzkers over the arrangements. But the agency was hindered by foreign bank secrecy laws that concealed what the Pritzkers owned.

In 2002, a few cracks appeared in the wall of secrecy when two young Pritzker heirs filed a lawsuit claiming their older relatives had looted their trusts. The litigation revealed that the family was worth at least $15 billion, that it was held in some 950 trusts, and that they were trying to split it up among 11 heirs by 2011.

One Democrat familiar with the transition said Thursday that Ms. Pritzker initially believed she could weather questions about Superior Bank, but her family resisted because their assets are so entangled.

The transition team’s vetting form, which she never filled out, required disclosing all property owned in the past decade, including “held in trust” or “held in combination with others.”

Jeff Zeleny contributed reporting.

Views: 144

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

This guy gets shadier and shadier any time I look into his finances....
Of course He also got a lot of money from Goldman-Sachs, Wall Street and British Petroleum.
Much of America's spiritual entities have vilified Israel. Specifically within the Christian groups. In particular are those who believe that Israel is out of the picture and Christianity has replaced The Yahudah. This has become a very dangerous 'doctrine'. The downfall of Israel then Yahudah came from what nations?

Those who subscribe to replacement theology have ( I believe ) have been (are) the reason we have who we have in office.
Like the Prophet Jeremiah I believe we have in office exactly who Yahweh has installed. We have been a very disobedient nation; therefore Jeremiah and Daniel are representatives of days gone by : come revisited : to bring 'us' what we have asked for.

Since, we as a nation, have decided that the church has replaced Israel; the church can now experience that which Israel and Yahudah experienced; closing the last days with a twist.

We now have a Muslim in office preparing to remove America from within. Which is what many leaders from the past have: prophesied : and now it is in our face. "We" (used as an inference) Americans, Christian Americans have brought upon the same scenario as what the "Jews" faced from Babylon and Assyria.

So you wanna be my people who replaced My people: Prepare for the wrath that My people have experienced by disobeying me; by participating with the very same idols and practices that brought my wrath, then. Your president, the man I appointed, is my choice as Babylon and Assyria was then.

If we are really ready for the coming of Yahshua, should we (those who guard and obey His commands) not feel the excitement of His soon coming. What better way to encourage Yahshua's coming than be serious with our lives by, not acting like, but do and be who we 'are'. The "coming" of Obama should excite us. I applaud him for being and doing as he is. Are we actually afraid? Why?

Wake up and smell the dawning of a new day. The soon coming of The Son.
He aught to be impeached, or held on high treason against the American people, especially over this whole BP oil spill thing... denying private relief efforts to help... he is beyond shameful, he is a despicable leader.
No one gets to be an elected official let alone the President of the USA without the aristocracy approving his 'appointment' to the office.
Then we are a despicable people to have voted him in.

Aysh_Milchama bar Lorenzo said:
No one gets to be an elected official let alone the President of the USA without the aristocracy approving his 'appointment' to the office.
Politicians are always bragging or complaining about their "campaign", i.e war, contributions for their political offices. The cadidate with the most Fortune 100 contributions is the winner. Citizens elect no one. Anyone persuing a political elected or appointed office in the Beast System must get major financial endorsement from the Aristocracy. Too many people in so-called industrialized nations enjoy life in a false reality regarding their spirituality, society and culture. Politics is not something that the Set-Apart people of Israel living in captivity are permitted to endorse. People who consider themselves Israelites living in a non-captive diaspora are oblivious to the truth,

Oblivious sleepwalkers want to keep on thinking that an aristocratic oligarchy is ok just as long as they get paid well and are not being oppressed. They don't have any spiritual or moral objections against their home country making imperialist and oppressive measures against fictitious enemies. Their rabbis and pastors will tell them that it is "the Will of the Lord" to make war on the foriegner...and asleep they fall.

Yaacov said:
Of course He also got a lot of money from Goldman-Sachs, Wall Street and British Petroleum.

Reply to Discussion













© 2019   Created by James Trimm.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service