Nazarene Space


We have just published a new free ebook from the Worldwide Nazarene Assembly of Elohim:

 

Reclaiming Yeshua for Judaism

http://www.lulu.com/nazarene


http://www.archive.org/details/ReclaimingYeshuaForJudaism

 

Reclaiming%20Yeshua.pdf


This is a free book which may be freely distributed unaltered as widely as you like.

 

This new book is aimed toward Rabbinic Jews as an introduction to Nazarene Judaism and the real Yeshua.

 

 

Forget everything you have ever heard about “Jesus”.  The majority of it is simply false.  His name was not Jesus,
he was not born on December 25th, he was not the founder of Christianity, he did not wear a toga, have blue eyes, a goatee beard or blonde hair.  The historical “Jesus of Nazareth” has been hijacked by Gentiles, paganized, helenized and stripped of his Torah Observant Judaism. 

 

The real Yeshua was a Torah Observant Jew, he was born in the Fall (probably duing the feast of Sukkot), he did not create a new religion and wore traditional Jewish clothing with tzitzit.  He almost certainly had brown eyes, dark
hair and a full beard, spoke Hebrew and Aramaic and staunchly opposed paganism. 

 

 

 




Folks is this work worthy of your support?

You can donate by going to the chip-in counter at http://www.nazarenespace.com; or donations can be sent by paypal to donations@wnae.org

Donations can also be made out to “Nazarene Judaism” and sent to:

Nazarene Judaism
PO Box 471
Hurst, TX 76053
http://www.wnae.org

 

 

 

 

Views: 96

Comment by Yacov Shlomo on December 27, 2010 at 12:59am

You wrote that Yeshua was born in the Spring. I think that you meant to state that Yeshua was born in the Fall.

I would not be surprised if Yeshua had Strawberry Blond hair as a young man since it is written that his Father had the same.

Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 1:40am
corrected, thanks.
Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 8:57am
I'm simply saying that Yeshua was Jewish and therefore had typical Jewish features, despite the fact that he has been gentilized by gentiles in gentile art for nearly 2,000 years and given a non-Jewish appearance, in an attempt to strip Him of his Jewishness.
Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 9:09am
No it is about cultural identification.
Comment by Yacov Shlomo on December 27, 2010 at 2:10pm

I agree Rabbi Trimm that Yeshua has been culturized as a goy by the goys.

 

My only point about the color of hair Christian is that Moshiach David's hair was strawberry blond. Please read Shmuel Alef 16: 12. Shmuel describes David ben Yishai with ruddy cheeks, red hair (strawberry blond) and bright eyes. 

 

Jeremiah - The learning of the Talmud is not madness. John the revelators vision is in the Talmud - the book that xtians consider to be a book of Idolatry. Since Yeshua was indeed a Pharisee in his day, why would you have a problem with learning to be a Pharisee? If a person has a problem with a Pharisee, then they would have a problem with every Rabbi, every Lawyer/Attorney, and those of us that study to make oneself approved before G-d and man. In Yeshuas day, there were Pharisees of the people. The title of a Pharisee is an extremely Honorable Title in Judaism. a Pharisee in xtianity is an extremely dishonorable title to bestow on someone even though Rav Shaul was a Pharisee of Pharisees, Matityahu and Mark were Pharisees and knew the inns and outs of the religious Pharisees of the day, Yeshua and his Talmidim were all Pharisees. Most Pharisees of Yeshuas day were indeed righteous, however, they were not apart of the Chasidic or pious ones that moved to the desert.

Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 2:24pm

The point of this new book is not to change Nazarene Judaism.  In fact much of it is cut and pasted from my various postings, articles etc. 

 

The purpose of the book is to introduce Rabbinic Jews to Nazarene Judaism. 

 


Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 2:55pm
Yes, it is a Hebrew translation from the Greek.  I prefer the actual Hebrew and Aramaic manuscript versions.
Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 3:38pm

Jeremiah,

 

Where do you get this stuff?

 

>they where the ones that came out of babylon with mixed teaching (sic)

The Pharisees began as a sect during the Maccabean period in Judea...  they descended from Jews who had come out of Babylon over 300 years earlier! 

>And they took over the preist hood (sic)

 

Huh?  The Pharisees did not control the priesthood, the Sadducees did.

 

>But the yoke of man is what yeshua was talking about

 

Yeshua never even uttered the phase "yoke of man"

Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 5:29pm

I have read Jacob Neusner and no where have I found him saying that Pharisaic Judaism "came out of Babylon" mixed or otherwise.  Pharisaic Judaism originated in Judea in the late Maccabean period. Yeshua accused certain Pharisees of hypocrisy, but the Talmud makes the same accusation, so I am not sure how that helps your anti-Talmud case.  It is well known that the Sadducees and not the Pharisees controlled the Temple Priesthood.  I am not familiar with the word "convo" but this book has nothing to do with being "accepted" (I assume that is what you meant, not "excepted" which has essentially the opposite meaning).  We have always maintained that Nazarene Judaism has its own halachic authority (The International Nazarene Beit Din).  Finally anyone familiar with Rabbinic Judaism knows that it flows from the House of Hillel which prevailed over Shammai.  

Comment by James Trimm on December 27, 2010 at 10:29pm
Wow Jeremiah... just wow....

Comment

You need to be a member of Nazarene Space to add comments!

Join Nazarene Space

 

 

 

















 

LINKS

 

 

 

 

Badge

Loading…

© 2019   Created by James Trimm.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service